ANALYSIS OF 2004 CLARK COUNTY
ANIMAL CONTROL STATISTICS
The Las Vegas Valley Humane Society has been
compiling Clark County animal statistics for seven years
using the same format. This format is generally accepted
for comparison of animal control programs. We are open to
suggestions on ways to make the data more comparable. One
item tending to reduce the comparability of the report is
the “other” category. This is a forced number
arrived at by subtracting the sum of the four items reported
from the total impounds. Ideally for comparability this number
should be zero as the Henderson number is for 2004. The larger
the number the more distortion in comparisons. Examples are
in North Las Vegas the “other” category is 28%
of total impounds and the City of Las Vegas number is 15%.
Because various animal control organizations present the
data for the attached report in different formats we have
to extract the information and make decisions that affect
the report. We realize that there are unavoidable distortions
such as animals impounded one year and adopted out the next,
but these numbers should tend to cancel out. If each animal
control organization would furnish just the impounds and
numbers in the four categories in a way that reduces the “other” category,
comparisons will be more accurate.
There are a number of ways to analyze the data reported.
A common method is the per cent of impounds that are euthanized.
We prefer to look at the number of impounds per 1000 residents.
An animal control program that has only 10 impounds per 1000
residents is certainly more effective than one with 40 impounds,
if there is comparable enforcement. In any program there
are a small number of unavoidable euthanizations. The program
with 10 impounds may be forced to euthanize 50% of impounds
while the program with 40 may euthanize only 25%. Obviously
the program that kills only 5 animals per 1,000 residents
is better than the one that kills 10 even though it kills
50% of the animals impounded.
Over the seven years that the humane society has kept statistics
the number of animals killed per 1,000 residents has slowly
declined from 16.2 in 1998 to 14 in 2004. The number of animals
impounded has decreased from 38.3 per 1,000 residents in
1998 to 33.2 in 2004. Unfortunately in the same period the
number of adoptions per 1,000 residents has decreased from
16.2 to 9.2 in spite of increased efforts and expenditures
by the animal adoption agencies in the county.
We see no indication that the yearly decrease in the number of adoptions per
1,000 residents will change in the future. The costs per adoption will also
continue to rise. Spay and neuter programs as a way to reduce overpopulation
thus become more effective relative to adoptions every year. Expanding the
spay and neuter programs in Clark County is the only cost effective method
of reducing pet overpopulation and the associated killing of animals. There
are many examples of the success of such programs in the US. San Francisco
and New York City have both reduced their animal euthanasia rates to below
5 per 1000 residents. This has been accomplished through drastically reducing
the number of animals impounded primarily through extensive spay and neuter
programs. We would like to see this reduction in Clark County and are continually
working towards this goal. The costs of government financed spay and neuter
programs are recovered in a few years by the reduction in animal control costs.
More importantly the number of animals killed is drastically reduced by such
programs.
Demonstrated
below is the effect of New Hampshire's 1994 Animal
Population Control Program. This targeted program
funded by dog registration fees enables pet owners
on public assistance to have their animals sterilized
for $10. Veterinarians participating in the program
are reimbursed for 80% of their regular fees. |
YEAR |
IMPOUNDS |
KILLED/1,000 RESIDENTS |
1992 |
20,530 |
10.4 |
1993 |
19,275 |
10.4 |
1994 |
18,642 |
9.4 |
1995 |
16,145 |
6.5 |
1996 |
16,766 |
6.0 |
1997 |
15,063 |
5.2 |
1998 |
13,862 |
4.2 |
1999 |
12,369 |
2.8 |
2000 |
12,800 |
2.4 |
Cost
of Progam |
YEAR |
SURGERIES
PERFORMED |
COST |
1995 |
3,384 |
$122,114 |
1996 |
3,526 |
$126,899 |
1997 |
4,006 |
$155,404 |
1998 |
4,715 |
$183,410 |
1999 |
5,196 |
$210,998 |
2000 |
4,664 |
$209,199 |
2001 |
4,055 |
$224,199 |
Totals |
29,546 |
$1,232,223 |
Vet contribution |
Through reduced rates |
$250,000 |
*All information
on the New Hampshire program is based on the "Animal
Control Management" guidebook of the International
City/County Management Association (ICMA publication
No. 43008).
In the six years since the
program's inception, New Hampshire shelters accounting
for 95% of the animals admitted 30,985 fewer animals
than in the 6 years preceding the program. Based on a
sheltering cost of of $105 per animal, the program saved
the state more than $2.2 million. This
is a return of $3.15 for each dollar spent. This financial
benefit is in addition to grreatly lowering the animal
killing rate which is our goal. This is a
win/win program.
Untargeted
spay & neuter
programs just do not work. In some places where 80% of
the animals have been sterilized there is still pet overpopulation.
In Clark County, the number of animals sterilized has
increased greatly over the past few years, but the number
of animals killed per 1,000 residents has barely dropped.
Places
that have significantly reduced pet overpopulation
have done so by reducing their impound rates using
targeted spay & neuter programs. Clark
County must insitute a targeted spay & neuter program
if we are to reduce the animal impound and killing rate.
|